Savings verification
Understand what changed, and how much energy it saved
Compare measured energy use after an improvement with a baseline for the reporting conditions. The calculation, data coverage and adjustments sit beside the result.
Why not compare with last year?
There is no meter for energy that was not used, so a saving is a comparison with what the building would have used. Last year’s total, with no adjustment, answers a question nobody asked: the two years differ in weather, occupancy and often tenants. A baseline run over the conditions that actually occurred does not. Read the argument
How it works
How is a saving worked out?
- 1
Baseline
Fit a model to a period before the change.
- 2
Reporting period
Measure energy after the change.
- 3
Comparison
Run the model over the reporting conditions and compare.
The result
What does a result include?
- Energy saved, with the baseline and reporting periods.
- The share of the period that was actually measured.
- Any adjustments, with their reasons.
- The method, fit and limits.
A result analyses the data supplied. It is not a certification or third-party assurance.

Method
Which IPMVP option fits?
| Option | Boundary | Measured |
|---|---|---|
| A · key parameter | The affected system | The driving parameter; others stipulated |
| B · all parameters | The affected system | Everything, by submeter |
| C · whole facility | The incoming supply | Use, regressed on weather and other drivers |
Option D, calibrated simulation, gives modelled rather than measured savings, and is labelled that way. Drivers, fit criteria and adjustments
Changes the model cannot explain, such as a floor taken out of service, are adjusted for explicitly with the evidence attached. Otherwise a new baseline is set.
What data does a project need?
A baseline period, a reporting period and the energy records for both. Send us what you have and we will say which option it can support.